WHY THE FLAT EARTH DEBATE IS ILLOGICAL
-I'll be harping on this main point:
DEBATES ARE FUTILE AND USELESS UNLESS:
1. GLOBE VS NON-GLOBE
or
2. GLOBE VS. FLAT with evidence of Flatless including the "edge".
HOWEVER--without an "edge", it cannot be determined if it is flat or perhaps another larger mass with a spherical shape. This debate would also necessitate evidence of its roundness.
The only valid debate in 2019, which the globe loses, is GLOBE vs NON-GLOBE.
ALL OTHER DEBATES ARE INVALID FOR LACK OF EVIDENCE ON BOTH SIDES.
**THE SOLUTION?**GO TO THE EDGE OR GO HIGH ENOUGH TO SEE CURVE OR HAVE A REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF IT AND FIND IT TO BE ABSENT.
DEBATES ARE FUTILE AND USELESS UNLESS:
1. GLOBE VS NON-GLOBE
or
2. GLOBE VS. FLAT with evidence of Flatless including the "edge".
HOWEVER--without an "edge", it cannot be determined if it is flat or perhaps another larger mass with a spherical shape. This debate would also necessitate evidence of its roundness.
The only valid debate in 2019, which the globe loses, is GLOBE vs NON-GLOBE.
ALL OTHER DEBATES ARE INVALID FOR LACK OF EVIDENCE ON BOTH SIDES.
**THE SOLUTION?**GO TO THE EDGE OR GO HIGH ENOUGH TO SEE CURVE OR HAVE A REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF IT AND FIND IT TO BE ABSENT.
